Is Santa Claus Involved in the Conspiracy Against Anwar? - Pieter D'Cruz

PKR has sunk to UMNO's level. When UMNO set-up Umi Hafilda's ceramah across the road from where Anwar was speaking during the recent by-election in Kerdau, I was amused. When PKR announced the DNA roadshow, I was rolling on the ground laughing. It is so UMNO. What happened to the promise "we will not only be doing things better, we will be doing things differently"?. It sounds so hollow now.

by Pieter D'Cruz via e-mail

---

PKR's decision to launch the nationwide roadshow labeled "Datuk Najib Altantuya (DNA)" is ridiculous, almost farcical. Tit-for-Tat as reported by the news portal, Malaysian Insider. It is so infantile.

PKR has sunk to UMNO's level. When UMNO set-up Umi Hafilda's ceramah across the road from where Anwar was speaking during the recent by-election in Kerdau, I was amused. When PKR announced the DNA roadshow, I was rolling on the ground laughing. It is so UMNO.

What happened to the promise "we will not only be doing things better, we will be doing things differently"?. It sounds so hollow now.

The stark truth is that Anwar is under pressure to submit his DNA to prove his innocence. To divert attention from Anwar's quandary, PKR decides to resurrect the Altantuya murder case to hit back at Najib Razak. It is like flogging a dead horse.

Why the submission of the DNA is a contentious issue is beyond me. If I were charged with a sex crime and there was DNA evidence to prove my innocence, I would be kicking and screaming to give my DNA for testing.

Even if his DNA matches the DNA of male Y found on Saiful, Anwar still has room to manoeuvre. He could claim that his semen was carried by a white stork, smeared on Saiful by the tooth-fairy, egged by Santa Claus. I bet the defence would call the tooth-fairy and Santa Claus as witnesses.

To implicate Najib with the Altantuya murder case is absurd. His only link is that one of the suspects was a personal friend. That suspect was later acquitted by the court. The connection is so remote. It is akin to saying that since I am renting a house owned by Effendi Norwawi, I am also partying with Maya Karin.

In Anwar's sodomy case, the scenario and circumstances are wholly different. He was named by the complainant and he was proven to be at the place where the crime was committed during material time. The DNA, of course, is the smoking gun.

Notwithstanding all I have said above, I would still love to attend the DNA roadshow. It has been a long time since the last circus came to town.

PIETER D'CRUZ

Section 52, PJ Land Development: PKNS's Reply Unsatisfactory - Pieter D'Cruz

I refer to the reply dated 11 January 2011 by Ms Azilah Arasad, a PKNS public relations officer to allegations which first appeared on 21 December 2010 about the PKNS land development project in Section 52, Petaling Jaya.

It has taken three long weeks for PKNS to reply but nonetheless they did and for that I thank them.

However, Ms Azilah's letter has not clarified matters by much because in the interim other allegations have come to the surface. Perhaps PKNS itself may not be in the position to provide a fuller explanation, so it is regrettable that political leaders named in the 21 December news report have thus far opted to remain silent. Rest assured that tongues will continue wagging and their credibility as politicians who believe in a transparent and accountable government is at stake.

PKNS's claim through Ms Azilah's letter that the state government was not involved in the series of transaction is a bit disingenuous. Nobody said it was wholly involved but as everyone knows, the Menteri Besar is the PKNS chairman and PKNS is a state GLC.

On the whole the explanation is somewhat pointless and self-defeating as the real issue has not been dealt with, that is, the benefactor and the real beneficiary from the whole deal remain as alleged.

What concerns voters is that the 'old way' of doing things under the BN state government is being perpetuated by the PR one, which came to power promising to end corruption and cronyism. Has it actually been keeping to that promise in this particular case? That is what the public want to know.

As someone who had voted for PKR in 2008, I have to say I am beginning to be disappointed. It's quite reasonable to believe that this PJ Section 52 PKNS land matter is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to things that the state governing politicians wish to keep hidden from public view.

PIETER D'CRUZ

Kelana Jaya, Selangor

Disneyland vs PKNS land - Pieter D'Cruz

It has been two days since the exposé of the shady dealings between Khalid Ibrahim, the Selangor Menteri Besar and Azmin Ali, the Deputy President of PKR over a piece of PKNS land in Section 52, Petaling Jaya. Two days and not a single word from either of them. The silence is deafening.

When Khir Toyo, the previous Menteri Besar, was alleged to use state funds to pay for a trip to Disneyland, PKR leaders went to town crying thief. Yet when the present Menteri Besar gave away PKNS land to a crony, the PKR leadership chooses to be quieter than a church mouse.

If the trip to Disneyland was brought to SELCAT, then shouldn’t the giving away of PKNS land merit the same treatment? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Unless, of course, one believes that corruption is kosher once blessed by a leader sent by God.

And they have the audacity to promise 10 reforms within 100 days if given the powers to govern the country. The only change to Selangor, a state that they have ruled for more than 1000 days, is a new line-up of cronies.

Yes, it’s the season for giving and forgiving but, no, giving away a piece of land owned by the rakyat is not on my gift list and hypocrites are not on my list of people to be forgiven.

Wishing Malaysians of the Christian faith, A Merry Xmas and all Malaysians, A Happy New Year. May the Good Lord bless and protect our beloved country.



PIETER D’CRUZ

The closet gay and the XDPMILF syndrome - Pieter D'Cruz

It didn’t surprise me one bit our neighbour’s intelligence services’ finding that Anwar Ibrahim “did indeed commit the acts for which he is currently indicted”. It concurs with the finding of the Federal Court, dated 2 September, 2004, that Anwar Ibrahim did indeed engage in homosexual activities.

It is hard for the general public to accept the fact that Anwar is a homosexual because of his image as a pious Muslim and the circumstances of the charges against him. Most people can’t visualize how a 63-year old man (with a bad case of backache) could force himself on a 23-year old man. It boggles the mind so much so that it’s a lot easier to accept that the charges are part of the political conspiracy to destroy Anwar Ibrahim.

Perhaps, a change in perspective of the said homosexual activities could enlighten the general public. The dominant person needs not use force to rape his victims. He seduces them. Initially, he was not the giving end, he was the receiving end. He was the “queen”. Only later in the relationship would the roles be interchangeable.

The victims were very vulnerable to the dominant person’s advances because of his stature. It is a case of rape by a person of authority. Most of his victims are young men of low social standing such as his driver, his coffee-boy, etc. They were overwhelmed by the XDPMILF syndrome i.e. “eX-Deputy Prime Minister I Like to F**k” syndrome.

As a liberal, I don’t give a damn about a person’s sexual orientation. I don’t care a bit if my mechanic is gay, as long as he could repair my car. I don’t give a s**t if my golf-caddy is a lesbian, as long as she could perform the duties I paid her for.

But in the case of Anwar Ibrahim, it’s totally a different kettle of fish. This guy wants to be the Prime Minister and he may well be a closet gay. As a Prime Minister, he would be a victim of blackmail by foreign governments and we would suffer for that. Furthermore, he started his political career as an activist of political Islam and even now holds himself out to be a champion of moderate Islam. The hypocrisy stinks to high-heaven.

All this while he has been denying to the public that he indulges in homosexual activities, claiming it to be a fabricated lie. Do we want another liar as a Prime Minister?

And if Anwar Ibrahim is a closet gay, what’s there to prevent him from being a closet despot?



PIETER D'CRUZ

Khir vs Anwar - Who is more honourable? - Pieter D'Cruz

I read yesterday that Datuk Seri Mohd Khir Toyo has resigned as the Opposition leader of the Selangor state legislative assembly after he was charged by the Anti-Corruption Commission over the purchase of two lots of land and a bungalow in Shah Alam.

I am no big fan of Datuk Seri Khir but I have to admit that it was the honourable course of action that he took in resigning as the state opposition leader. While he is preparing for his trial, it is not likely he can devote much time or attention to his duties as opposition leader. The citizens of Selangor should not be deprived of their right to have an opposition leader in the state assembly who can fully perform his duties. It is quite commendable that Khir has given way to someone else.

I am therefore most puzzled as to why the opposition leader in our federal parliament has not chosen to do likewise. He is presently embroiled in a sodomy trial.

Would it not be more honourable for him to step down as opposition leader, like Khir Toyo, so that he can devote his fullest attention to his trial and allow another MP with much less time-consuming encumbrances to take over?

Maybe the Selangor opposition leader had to resign because he is a ‘God-cursed’ leader whereas the federal opposition leader is a ‘gift from God’ to the people of Malaysia. I really do not know. I hope he or anyone else within the federal opposition circle can answer my question.



PIETER D'CRUZ